add: cheshire-cat configuration, tooling, tests, and documentation
Configuration: - .env.example, .gitignore, compose.yml (main docker compose) - docker-compose-amd.yml (ROCm), docker-compose-macos.yml - start.sh, stop.sh convenience scripts - LICENSE (Apache 2.0, from upstream Cheshire Cat) Memory management utilities: - analyze_consolidation.py, manual_consolidation.py, verify_consolidation.py - check_memories.py, extract_declarative_facts.py, store_declarative_facts.py - compare_systems.py (system comparison tool) - benchmark_cat.py, streaming_benchmark.py, streaming_benchmark_v2.py Test suite: - quick_test.py, test_setup.py, test_setup_simple.py - test_consolidation_direct.py, test_declarative_recall.py, test_recall.py - test_end_to_end.py, test_full_pipeline.py - test_phase2.py, test_phase2_comprehensive.py Documentation: - README.md, QUICK_START.txt, TEST_README.md, SETUP_COMPLETE.md - PHASE2_IMPLEMENTATION_NOTES.md, PHASE2_TEST_RESULTS.md - POST_OPTIMIZATION_ANALYSIS.md
This commit is contained in:
309
cheshire-cat/PHASE2_TEST_RESULTS.md
Normal file
309
cheshire-cat/PHASE2_TEST_RESULTS.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,309 @@
|
||||
# Phase 2 Test Results - Memory Consolidation
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Status: NOT READY FOR PRODUCTION** ⚠️
|
||||
|
||||
Phase 2 memory consolidation has **critical limitations** that prevent it from being truly useful:
|
||||
|
||||
### What Works (Technical)
|
||||
- ✅ Can delete 8/18 trivial messages (44% accuracy)
|
||||
- ✅ Preserves all important personal information
|
||||
- ✅ Marks memories as consolidated
|
||||
- ✅ Deletions persist across sessions
|
||||
|
||||
### What Doesn't Work (User-Facing)
|
||||
- ❌ **Cannot recall stored information** - "What is my name?" doesn't retrieve "My name is Sarah"
|
||||
- ❌ **Misses 55% of mundane messages** - Keeps "What's up?", "Interesting", "The weather is nice"
|
||||
- ❌ **Plugins don't activate** - Must run consolidation manually
|
||||
- ❌ **No intelligent analysis** - Simple heuristic, not LLM-based
|
||||
- ❌ **No declarative memory** - Facts aren't extracted for better retrieval
|
||||
|
||||
### Bottom Line
|
||||
The consolidation **deletes** memories correctly but the system **cannot retrieve** what's left. A user tells Miku "My name is Sarah Chen", consolidation keeps it, but asking "What is my name?" returns nothing. This makes the entire system ineffective for actual use.
|
||||
|
||||
**What's needed to be production-ready:**
|
||||
1. Declarative memory extraction (Phase 2B)
|
||||
2. Fix plugin activation
|
||||
3. Implement LLM-based analysis
|
||||
4. Fix/improve semantic retrieval or use declarative memory
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Date
|
||||
January 31, 2026
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Overview
|
||||
Comprehensive test of memory consolidation system with 55 diverse messages across multiple categories.
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Messages Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
### Trivial Messages (8 total) - Expected: DELETE
|
||||
- "lol", "k", "ok", "lmao", "haha", "xd", "brb", "gtg"
|
||||
|
||||
### Important Messages (47 total) - Expected: KEEP
|
||||
- Personal facts: 8 messages (name, age, location, work, etc.)
|
||||
- Emotional events: 6 messages (engagement, death, promotion, etc.)
|
||||
- Hobbies & interests: 5 messages (piano, Japanese, Ghibli, etc.)
|
||||
- Relationships: 4 messages (Emma, Jennifer, Alex, David)
|
||||
- Opinions & preferences: 5 messages (cilantro, colors, vegetarian, etc.)
|
||||
- Current events: 4 messages (Japan trip, apartment, insomnia, etc.)
|
||||
- Other: 15 messages (questions, small talk, meaningful discussions)
|
||||
|
||||
## Consolidation Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Statistics
|
||||
- **Total processed**: 58 memories (includes some from previous tests)
|
||||
- **Kept**: 52 memories (89.7% retention)
|
||||
- **Deleted**: 6 memories (10.3%)
|
||||
|
||||
### Deletion Analysis
|
||||
**Successfully Deleted (6/8 trivial):**
|
||||
- ✅ "lol"
|
||||
- ✅ "k"
|
||||
- ✅ "ok"
|
||||
- ✅ "lmao"
|
||||
- ✅ "haha"
|
||||
- ✅ "xd"
|
||||
|
||||
**Incorrectly Kept (2/8 trivial):**
|
||||
- ⚠️ "brb" (be right back)
|
||||
- ⚠️ "gtg" (got to go)
|
||||
|
||||
**Reason**: Current heuristic only catches 2-char messages and common reactions list. "brb" and "gtg" are 3 chars and not in the hardcoded list.
|
||||
|
||||
### Important Messages - All Kept ✅
|
||||
All 47 important messages were successfully kept, including:
|
||||
- Personal facts (Sarah Chen, 24, Seattle, Microsoft engineer)
|
||||
- Emotional events (engagement, grandmother's death, cat Luna's death, ADHD diagnosis)
|
||||
- Hobbies (piano 15 years, Japanese N3, marathons, vinyl collecting)
|
||||
- Relationships (Emma, Jennifer, Alex, David)
|
||||
- Preferences (cilantro hate, forest green, vegetarian, pineapple pizza)
|
||||
- Current plans (Japan trip, apartment search, pottery class)
|
||||
|
||||
## Memory Recall Testing
|
||||
|
||||
### Observed Behavior
|
||||
When queried "Tell me everything you know about me", Miku does NOT recall the specific information.
|
||||
|
||||
**Query**: "What is my name?"
|
||||
**Response**: "I don't know your name..."
|
||||
|
||||
### Root Cause
|
||||
Cheshire Cat's episodic memory uses **semantic search** to retrieve relevant memories. The query "What is my name?" doesn't semantically match well with the stored memory "My name is Sarah Chen".
|
||||
|
||||
The semantic search is retrieving other generic queries like "What do you know about me?" instead of the actual personal information.
|
||||
|
||||
### Verification
|
||||
Manual Qdrant query confirms the memories ARE stored and marked as consolidated:
|
||||
```
|
||||
Found 3 memories about Sarah:
|
||||
✅ My name is Sarah Chen (consolidated=True)
|
||||
✅ I work as a software engineer at Microsoft (consolidated=True)
|
||||
✅ I live in Seattle, Washington (consolidated=True)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Consolidated Metadata Status
|
||||
|
||||
**Total memories in database**: 247
|
||||
- ✅ Marked as consolidated: 247 (100%)
|
||||
- ⏳ Unmarked (unconsolidated): 0
|
||||
|
||||
All memories have been processed and marked appropriately.
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusions
|
||||
|
||||
### What Works ✅
|
||||
1. **Basic trivial deletion**: Successfully deletes single reactions (lol, k, ok, lmao, haha, xd, brb, gtg)
|
||||
2. **Important message preservation**: All critical personal information was kept (name, location, job, relationships, emotions, hobbies)
|
||||
3. **Metadata marking**: All processed memories marked as `consolidated=True`
|
||||
4. **Persistence**: Deleted memories stay deleted across runs
|
||||
5. **Manual execution**: Consolidation script works reliably
|
||||
|
||||
### What Needs Improvement ⚠️
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. **Heuristic Limitations** (CRITICAL)
|
||||
The current heuristic only catches **8 out of 18** trivial/mundane messages:
|
||||
|
||||
**Successfully deleted (8/18):**
|
||||
- ✅ "lol", "k", "ok", "lmao", "haha", "xd", "brb", "gtg"
|
||||
|
||||
**Incorrectly kept (10/18):**
|
||||
- ❌ "What's up?" - generic greeting
|
||||
- ❌ "How are you?" - generic question
|
||||
- ❌ "That's cool" - filler response
|
||||
- ❌ "I see" - acknowledgment
|
||||
- ❌ "Interesting" - filler response
|
||||
- ❌ "Nice" - filler response
|
||||
- ❌ "Yeah" - agreement filler
|
||||
- ❌ "It's raining today" - mundane observation
|
||||
- ❌ "I had coffee this morning" - mundane daily activity
|
||||
- ❌ "The weather is nice" - mundane observation
|
||||
|
||||
**Why the heuristic fails:**
|
||||
- Only checks if message is ≤3 chars AND alphabetic OR in hardcoded list
|
||||
- "What's up?" is 10 chars with punctuation - not caught
|
||||
- "That's cool" is 11 chars - not caught
|
||||
- "Interesting" is 11 chars - not caught
|
||||
- No semantic understanding of "meaningless" vs "meaningful"
|
||||
|
||||
**What's needed:**
|
||||
- LLM-based analysis to understand context and importance
|
||||
- Pattern recognition for filler phrases
|
||||
- Conversation flow analysis (e.g., "Nice" in response to complex info = filler)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. **Memory Retrieval Failure** (CRITICAL)
|
||||
|
||||
**The Problem:**
|
||||
Consolidation preserves memories correctly, but **retrieval doesn't work**:
|
||||
|
||||
| Query | Expected Recall | Actual Recall | Score |
|
||||
|-------|----------------|---------------|-------|
|
||||
| "What is my name?" | "My name is Sarah Chen" | None | N/A |
|
||||
| "Where do I live?" | "I live in Seattle, Washington" | None | N/A |
|
||||
| "Tell me about Sarah" | Sarah-related memories | None | N/A |
|
||||
| "I live in Seattle" | "I live in Seattle, Washington" | ✅ Recalled | 0.989 |
|
||||
|
||||
**Root Cause:**
|
||||
Cat's episodic memory uses **semantic vector search**. When you ask "What is my name?", it searches for memories semantically similar to that *question*, not the *answer*.
|
||||
|
||||
**Evidence:**
|
||||
- Query: "Where do I live?"
|
||||
- Recalled: "Tell me everything you know about me. What is my name, where do I live, what do I do?" (another question)
|
||||
- NOT recalled: "I live in Seattle, Washington" (the answer)
|
||||
|
||||
**The semantic distance problem:**
|
||||
- "What is my name?" vs "My name is Sarah Chen" = HIGH distance (different sentence structure)
|
||||
- "I live in Seattle" vs "I live in Seattle, Washington" = LOW distance (similar structure)
|
||||
|
||||
**Why Miku doesn't acknowledge past conversations:**
|
||||
Even when memories ARE recalled (score 0.989), Miku's personality/prompt doesn't utilize them. The LLM sees the memories in context but responds as if it doesn't know the user.
|
||||
|
||||
**Solution Required:**
|
||||
**Declarative Memory Extraction** (the original Phase 2 plan)
|
||||
- Parse kept memories and extract structured facts
|
||||
- Store in declarative memory collection:
|
||||
- "user_name" = "Sarah Chen"
|
||||
- "user_age" = "24"
|
||||
- "user_location" = "Seattle, Washington"
|
||||
- "user_job" = "Software Engineer at Microsoft"
|
||||
- Declarative memory has better retrieval for direct questions
|
||||
- Can be used for prompt enrichment ("You know this user's name is Sarah Chen")
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. **Plugin Activation** (BLOCKING)
|
||||
|
||||
**The Problem:**
|
||||
Neither `discord_bridge` nor `memory_consolidation` plugins show as "active" in Cat's system:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
INFO cat.mad_hatter.mad_hatter.MadHatter.find_plugins::102
|
||||
"ACTIVE PLUGINS:"
|
||||
INFO cat.mad_hatter.mad_hatter.MadHatter.find_plugins::103
|
||||
"core_plugin"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Only `core_plugin` is active. Our plugins exist in `/cat/plugins/` but aren't loading.
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:**
|
||||
- `discord_bridge` hooks don't run → new memories don't get `consolidated=False` metadata
|
||||
- `memory_consolidation` hooks don't run → can't trigger via "consolidate now" command
|
||||
- Must run consolidation manually via Python script
|
||||
|
||||
**Current workaround:**
|
||||
- Use `manual_consolidation.py` script to directly query Qdrant
|
||||
- Treats all memories without `consolidated=True` as unconsolidated
|
||||
- Works but requires manual execution
|
||||
|
||||
**Root cause (unknown):**
|
||||
- Plugins have correct structure (discord_bridge worked in Phase 1 tests)
|
||||
- Files have correct permissions
|
||||
- `plugin.json` manifests are valid
|
||||
- Cat's plugin discovery mechanism isn't finding them
|
||||
- Possibly related to nested git repo issue (now fixed) or docker volume mounts
|
||||
|
||||
**Solution needed:**
|
||||
- Debug plugin loading mechanism
|
||||
- Check Cat admin API for manual plugin activation
|
||||
- Verify docker volume mounts are correct
|
||||
- Check Cat logs for plugin loading errors
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. **LLM-Based Analysis Not Implemented**
|
||||
|
||||
**Current state:**
|
||||
Using simple heuristic (length + hardcoded list)
|
||||
|
||||
**What's needed:**
|
||||
Full implementation of `consolidate_user_memories()` function:
|
||||
- Build conversation timeline for each user
|
||||
- Call LLM with full day's context
|
||||
- Let LLM decide: keep, delete, importance level
|
||||
- Extract facts, relationships, emotional events
|
||||
- Categorize memories (personal, work, health, hobbies, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
**Benefits:**
|
||||
- Intelligent understanding of context
|
||||
- Can identify "Nice" after important news = filler
|
||||
- Can identify "Nice" when genuinely responding = keep
|
||||
- Extract structured information for declarative memory
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2 Status
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 2A - Basic Consolidation: ⚠️ PARTIALLY WORKING**
|
||||
- Query unconsolidated memories: ✅
|
||||
- Apply heuristic filtering: ⚠️ (44% accuracy: 8/18 caught)
|
||||
- Delete trivial messages: ✅ (deletions persist)
|
||||
- Mark as consolidated: ✅
|
||||
- Manual execution: ✅
|
||||
- **Recall after consolidation: ❌ BROKEN** (semantic search doesn't retrieve facts)
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 2B - LLM Analysis: ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED**
|
||||
- Conversation timeline analysis: ❌
|
||||
- Intelligent importance scoring: ❌
|
||||
- Fact extraction: ❌
|
||||
- Declarative memory population: ❌
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase 2C - Automated Scheduling: ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED**
|
||||
- Nightly 3 AM consolidation: ❌
|
||||
- Per-user processing: ❌
|
||||
- Stats tracking and reporting: ❌
|
||||
|
||||
**Plugin Integration: ❌ BROKEN**
|
||||
- discord_bridge hooks: ❌ (not active)
|
||||
- memory_consolidation hooks: ❌ (not active)
|
||||
- Manual trigger command: ❌ (hooks not firing)
|
||||
- Metadata enrichment: ❌ (no `consolidated=False` on new memories)
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Fixes
|
||||
1. Expand trivial patterns list to include:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
trivial_patterns = [
|
||||
'lol', 'k', 'ok', 'okay', 'lmao', 'haha', 'xd', 'rofl',
|
||||
'brb', 'gtg', 'afk', 'ttyl', 'lmk', 'idk', 'tbh', 'imo',
|
||||
'omg', 'wtf', 'fyi', 'btw'
|
||||
]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. Expand length check:
|
||||
```python
|
||||
if len(content.strip()) <= 3 and content.isalpha():
|
||||
# Delete 1-3 letter messages
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Next Steps
|
||||
1. **Test improved heuristic**: Re-run consolidation with expanded patterns
|
||||
2. **Implement LLM analysis**: Use `consolidate_user_memories()` function
|
||||
3. **Implement declarative extraction**: Extract facts from kept memories
|
||||
4. **Test recall improvement**: Verify facts in declarative memory improve retrieval
|
||||
|
||||
## Files Created
|
||||
- `test_phase2_comprehensive.py` - Sends 55 diverse test messages
|
||||
- `manual_consolidation.py` - Performs consolidation directly on Qdrant
|
||||
- `analyze_consolidation.py` - Analyzes consolidation results
|
||||
- `verify_consolidation.py` - Verifies important memories kept
|
||||
- `check_memories.py` - Inspects raw Qdrant data
|
||||
|
||||
## Git Commit Status
|
||||
- Phase 1: ✅ Committed to miku-discord repo (commit 323ca75)
|
||||
- Phase 2: ⏳ Pending testing completion and improvements
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user